From Google Human to Human OS: The Future of Whole-Person Intelligence

The Siloed Present: How Fragmented Data Fails Us

We live in a world of reductionist metrics. Healthcare sees us as blood pressure readings and lab results. Employers reduce us to productivity dashboards. Banks judge us via credit scores. Retailers and airlines surveille us through user loyalty programs which are routinely shared with a wide range of health and other commercial entities through networked relationships.  Electric car manufacturers track our driving habits, charging patterns, and location data (at least). Each system captures a sliver of our humanity, blind to the interconnected whole.

This fragmentation is both inefficient and potentially harmful. A cardiologist ignores sleep data that exacerbates heart disease. A bank denies a loan without considering a borrower’s recent recovery from cancer. Meanwhile, Big Tech hoards the map: Google and Apple aggregate our searches, movements, and biometrics, Meta monetizes our relationships, and insurers profit from our vulnerabilities.

The quantified self-movement promised liberation through data, but it only gave us more silos—a Fitbit for steps, MyFitnessPal for meals, Headspace for mindfulness. Meanwhile, “digital twins” in healthcare (virtual models of organs or genes) remain niche tools for the wealthy.

We need a system that sees all of us, while allowing the data owner use and access the data in a way that best serves them.

A Human OS could be a whole-person AI system that integrates our personal data across domains to serve our best interests while ensuring user sovereignty.

What Could We Know With Integrated Data?

Right now, we track our personal information in fragments—wearables count steps, apps log meals, and smartwatches measure heart rate. But what if we could connect the dots?

With a fully integrated personal AI, we could answer questions like:
🍷 How does the red wine I drank affect my cholesterol levels the next day?
🍔 Did my high-carb meal impact my sleep quality or blood sugar spikes?
🏋️‍♂️ What’s the optimal time for me to exercise based on my unique metabolic response?
💊 How does my specific gut microbiome influence how I absorb nutrients from food?
💼 How does my financial stress affect my heart rate variability and long-term health?

Right now, this data exists—but in silos. A “Human OS” system could bring people real-time, personalised insights, helping us make better decisions and prevent illness before it starts.

The Integrated Future: From Wearables to Whole-Person AI

The opportunities for an integrated Google Human extend way beyond healthcare.

Imagine a world where AI understands you as a dynamic, interconnected system that is optimised to serve you:

• Your financial stress triggers physiological changes (elevated cortisol, poor sleep) detected by wearables.
• AI detects spending patterns, income stability, and mental health factors to recommend personalized financial safety nets.
• Credit scores evolve to include holistic risk analysis beyond raw financial transactions.
• Fraud detection improves by analyzing cross-platform behavioral patterns.
• Your job’s erratic hours cross-reference with genetic predispositions to predict diabetes risk.
• Your neighborhood’s air quality data informs personalised asthma prevention plans.
• Your commute, driving habits, and EV charging patterns optimize energy consumption and route efficiency.
• AI integrates real-time weather, public transit, and health data to recommend the safest and most eco-friendly travel options.
• Your lifelong exposure to radiography—from X-rays to CT scans—is aggregated to assess cumulative radiation risk and guide safer diagnostic decisions.
• All personal data is stored in a self-sovereign identity system, giving individuals full control over data sharing.
• Fraud and identity theft are mitigated by real-time cross-referencing of anomalies

This isn’t sci-fi. Estonia’s e-health system already links patient data across hospitals, labs, and pharmacies.

The Ethical Crisis: Surveillance or Sovereignty?

The technology to build this exists. The danger lies in who controls it.

• China’s social credit system previews a dystopia where centralized data dictates life opportunities.
• Apple Health and Google Fit amass intimate data but lock it inside their ecosystems.
• Hospitals sell patient data to AI firms, while insurers hike premiums based on fitness tracker metrics.

The Privacy Paradox: To gain holistic insights, we must surrender data—but without safeguards, this becomes surveillance.

A unified Google Human requires new frameworks for data sovereignty that recognise the opportunities for using our own integrated data, while protecting individuals from the risks, rather than the current data protection acts that are designed for siloed data eras.

• Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI): Own your data via encrypted digital wallets that use decentralised block-chain infrastructure (e.g., IOTA, Solid Project).
• Algorithmic Audits: Mandate transparency for AI trained on cross-domain data.
• Data Cooperatives: Pool anonymized data for public good—like Singapore’s HealthHub, but governed by citizens, not corporations.

Case Studies: Utopias and Warnings

🔹 The Good: The use of supermarket loyalty card data is increasingly being used to understand dietary preferences and patterns in populations and has the potential to direct lifestyle and health promotion interventions. 

🔹 The Bad: Individual data monitoring and mining through Digital Personal Assistants (such as Alexa and Google Assistant) and Amazon Halo’s tone analysis AI sparked backlash for monetizing emotional data—a reminder that without ethics, integration becomes exploitation.

🔹 The Ugly: Data broker Datalogix sold lists of people classified by health-related conditions such as “allergy sufferers” and “dieters” (cited in Baik and Famularo).A study found that some data broker firms were willing and able to sell mental health data on Americans with depression, attention disorder, insomnia, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. ChatGPT-style models already diagnose patients, but when trained on non-diverse data, they misdiagnose minorities. Whole-person AI must confront bias head-on.

In the wrong hands, a Google Human could become a tool for exploitation rather than empowerment. Personal data—meant to enhance well-being—could be used for profit, manipulation, or discrimination.

For example:

If corporations and insurers gain access to such intimate details, they could deny coverage, adjust premiums, or manipulate consumers based on their vulnerabilities. Employers might use stress, sleep, or productivity data to justify layoffs or push employees into longer work hours.

Without strong data privacy protections and ethical AI governance, the Google Human could shift from a revolutionary force for good to an intrusive system that commodifies human lives.

Rebooting the System: Solutions, Not Sermons

To build “Google Human” that empowers, we need:

1. Decentralized Infrastructure: Blockchain-based systems where users grant temporary data access (e.g., doctors, employers) without relinquishing ownership.
2. Incentivized Sharing: Tokenize data contributions. Imagine earning crypto for sharing anonymized health data to train cancer-detection AI.
3. Policy Revolt: Laws that treat cross-domain data as a human right. Push for a Digital Geneva Convention banning predatory profiling.

Counterarguments: The Risks of Radical Transparency

Critics warn that overmedicalization could turn life into a constant diagnosis, where every biomarker is scrutinized, creating anxiety rather than well-being. To prevent this, systems must include opt-out rights and designated “data quiet hours” to give individuals control over when and how their data is used. Another major concern is corporate co-option—could tech giants like Google rebrand their surveillance-driven business models as “Google Human,” further entrenching data monopolies?

Without strong antitrust laws separating data custodians from service providers, the promise of whole-person AI could quickly become another tool for profit-driven exploitation.

The Call to Action: Build It Right

Google Human is inevitable. AI will merge our data—but will it entrench inequality or elevate equity?

To steer the future:

• Demand Legislation: Support laws like the EU’s Digital Services Act, expanded to ban cross-domain data abuse.
• Empower Communities: Back nonprofits like MyData Global, advocating for data sovereignty.
• Rethink Consent: Treat data sharing as organ donation—a conscious, values-driven choice.

What can individuals do now to protect their data sovereignty without limiting access data?

• Use privacy-focused health apps (e.g., Apple Health with local storage).
• Advocate for transparent AI policies in workplaces and insurance plans.
• Support decentralized identity projects (MyData, Solid Project).

Conclusion: A New Human Right

Whole-person intelligence isn’t just about boosting AI —it’s about rewriting the social contract in the algorithmic age, ensuring that systems serve everyone, not just the quantified, privileged few. The real choice isn’t between privacy and progress, but between centralised control and human sovereignty. To shape a future that empowers rather than exploits, we must build Google Human as an open-source, ethical, and user-owned system—one that truly belongs to us.

The upgrade starts now.

Further Reading

Oja, M., Tamm, S., Mooses, K., Pajusalu, M., Talvik, H. A., Ott, A., … & Reisberg, S. (2023). Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model: lessons learned. JAMIA open, 6(4), ooad100.

Nevalainen, J., Erkkola, M., Saarijärvi, H., Näppilä, T., & Fogelholm, M. (2018). Large-scale loyalty card data in health research. Digital health, 4, 2055207618816898.

Jenneson, V. L., Pontin, F., Greenwood, D. C., Clarke, G. P., & Morris, M. A. (2022). A systematic review of supermarket automated electronic sales data for population dietary surveillance. Nutrition reviews, 80(6), 1711-1722.

Hurel, L. M., & Couldry, N. (2022). Colonizing the home as data-source: Investigating the language of Amazon skills and google actions. International Journal of Communication, 16, 20.

Kemp, K. (2024). Driving Blind: The Unexamined Privacy Risks of Connected Cars. Available at SSRN.

Baik, J. S., & Famularo, J. (2024). Contextual integrity of loyalty programs, compromised? Interrogating consumer health data practices and networked actors in the US retail sector. Telecommunications Policy, 48(7), 102780.

Kim, J. (2023). Data brokers and the sale of Americans’ mental health data. Durham: Duke Sanford School of Public Policy.

Charles, S. (2023). The Algorithmic Bias and Misrepresentation of Mixed Race Identities: by Artificial Intelligence Systems in The West. GRACE: Global Review of AI Community Ethics, 1(1).

How is AI shaping the future of healthcare in Finland and Estonia?